Blog

GAAR Disharmony

“Chaos was the law of nature; order was the dream of man.” 
― Henry Adams, U.S. Historian

Adams’ description of chaos appears in his book, “The Education of Henry Adams,” which he wrote a century ago to describe his attempt to come to terms with the start of the 20th century, a period of rapid change and turmoil. The quote also crystalizes the experience of many tax professionals at the dawn of the 21st Century as they try to make sense of the chaotic jumble of tax-enforcement approaches and increasing use of general anti-avoidance regulations (GAARs) that vary dramatically – and confusingly – from country to country.

The depth of this chaos became clear throughout the presentations and off-line discussions that took place at a late-February Tax Executives Institute (TEI) seminar on international tax issues held in Atlanta. Presenters shared insights on GAARs – the principles-based rules, intended to broaden a government’s ability to thwart perceived avoidance of tax, that reside within a country’s tax code – as well as how governments within individual country tax codes are adopting different tax strategies.

One presenter pointed out the U.K.’s statements about wanting to become the most competitive tax regime in the G20. This stance differs markedly from the aggressive tax and auditing approaches currently embraced by countries such as Spain, France and India. Clearly, governments are trying to strike a balance between raising more revenue and becoming more business friendly. As a recent special report in The Economist put it, governments around the world are trying to raise “the largest possible amount of revenue with the smallest possible amount of economic and political damage.”

This tricky balancing act varies greatly from country to country, and presents tax professionals whose companies conduct international business, with a complex and unsettling challenge. Effectively addressing this challenge requires:

  • A firm understanding of the company’s risk profile and risk appetite (both of which should be clearly articulated);
  • A careful approach to creating legal entity structures when entering new countries;
  • A clear understanding of the relationship between business operations and legal entities; and
  • Tax operations that interact with the rest of the business in an aligned and risk-intelligent manner.

These are big, strategic undertakings. From a tax perspective, they require significant time, resources, planning and communications – which are absolutely necessary if tax professionals are to help their companies operate in an optimal fashion despite the chaos.

Please remember that the Tax Matters provides information for educational purposes, not specific tax or legal advice. Always consult a qualified tax or legal advisor before taking any action based on this information.


About this Contributor

Jon Sappey Headshot
Jon Sappey
Director of Industry Relations

Jon Sappey is Director of Industry Relations at Vertex, working with industry associations and other groups to maximize Vertex's support for and contribution to the advancement of the corporate tax profession. Jon came to Vertex in 1997 with a background in marketing, and he currently serves on a variety of strategy teams. He holds an MBA from Yale University and a BA from Harvard College.

Get the latest tax & technology insights from Vertex.

Explore Our Solutions

Discover how our technology solutions can help you streamline tax and grow your business.

Learn More
Video Thumbnail Name