Resource Library Landing Page

3 Reasons Why a Tax Engine for VAT Compliance is Worth the Investment

  • June 11, 2021

VAT compliance doesn’t come for free, however you choose to approach it. But is there a solid business case for investing in a tax engine to automate it? My answer is an emphatic “yes.” And, if you’d ask me to make my case in a single word, I’d say: “control.”

VAT may be one of your most substantial monetary flows. For some companies, the aggregate of input and output can be as much as 30% of total revenue. Tax authorities are increasingly imposing stringent reporting obligations, such as real-time reporting, SAF-T, and invoice clearance, which require first-time-right processing for VAT. In an invoice clearance model, for example, while there may be room for modifications, tax authorities will see the corrections, which could easily result in additional questions or an audit of the control framework. 

A tax engine for VAT helps companies to stay in control by enabling:

Connect to systems and reduce human error: One of the big challenges in VAT is that the relevant data and processes are scattered across various departments, including procurement and accounts payable. A single tax engine can be connected not only to multiple ERPs, but also other financial systems for procurement, expenses or e-commerce. Automating the VAT determination in the order-to-cash and procure-to-pay processes can help to forestall errors. There’s less human intervention in processing tax because the requirements are set centrally, and the tax engine can flag or block non-compliant transactions.

Keep VAT systems and knowledge structure up to date: VAT rates and rules are constantly changing. With home-grown solutions in ERP, or a tax add-on to a standard ERP, resources need to be secured for tax research, and for entering the changes into all financial systems. With a tax engine, the rates and rules are embedded and maintained in the software or cloud solution by the software vendor and automatically updated.

Scale easily: With a tax engine, it’s relatively easy to add jurisdictions, regions or newly acquired companies by extending a license or implementing an API into the ERP of the acquired business. It’s much harder to do with an in-house-developed VAT system. With a VAT add-on to an ERP system, adding an acquired company requires either embedding the new company into an ERP system or embedding the add-on in the acquired company’s systems.

These are decisive advantages for companies that want to compete in a global arena where reporting requirements are constantly changing and moving closer to real-time. In another post, I’ll explain how to sell the idea of a VAT tax engine to stakeholders with a detailed look at the qualitative and quantitative benefits.


Please remember that the Tax Matters provides information for educational purposes, not specific tax or legal advice. Always consult a qualified tax or legal advisor before taking any action based on this information. The views and opinions expressed in Tax Matters are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or opinion of Vertex Inc.

Blog Author

Peter Boerhof, VAT Director at Vertex Inc. Vertex's Chief Tax Office (CTO) provides insight regarding the impact of tax regulations, policy, enforcement, and emerging technology trends on global tax department operations.

Peter Boerhof

Director, VAT

See All Resources by Peter

Peter Boerhof is the VAT Director for Vertex. In his role, he provides insight and thought leadership regarding the impact of tax regulations, policy, enforcement, and emerging technology trends in global tax. Peter has extensive experience in international transactions, business restructuring, tax process optimization, and tax automation. Prior to joining Vertex, Peter was responsible for leading the indirect tax function at AkzoNobel, where he designed and implemented a tax control framework, optimized VAT, and managed the transition to a centralized tax operating model for global tax processes.

He was also responsible for indirect tax planning and compliance for merger and acquisition, supply chain, and ERP projects, as well as the implementation of tax automation initiatives like tax engines and robotics. Boerhof also worked at KPN Royal Dutch Telecom managing VAT, as well as Big Four accounting firms Deloitte and Ernst & Young (EY) advising on VAT compliance and optimization processes. Boerhof holds an MBA from the Rotterdam School of Management and a master’s in tax law from the University of Groningen.

View Newsletter Signup

Top Reasons for VAT Compliance Reporting

White Paper | Learn how automating your VAT reporting can enhance processes, so you can meet today’s VAT filing requirements while having the ability to respond to tomorrow’s business opportunity with confidence.

GET WHITE PAPER
Tax technology for the world