Brexit’s Impact on VAT Triangulation

How can your business remain VAT compliant throughout Europe as it faces the challenges of Brexit?

Future Ready: Tax Optimization in the SAP Ecosystem

Leaving is easy. Transitions are difficult.

Companies affected by Brexit should keep that in mind given that the UK’s departure will require many organisations to conduct rigorous analyses and potentially implement changes to remain VAT compliant throughout Europe. Unless another extension is applied, the UK will leave the EU by the 31 Jan deadline with a transitional period ending 31 Dec 2020. In the Brexit proposals drafted thus far by UK governments, the explicit aim is to reach a Free Trade Agreement with the EU. This desire appears mutual, yet little attention has so far been paid to how to address in the UK-EU deal.

During the transition and settlement periods, the UK will lose membership and safeguards of EU institutions. As a consequence, by the end of 2020, it will lose most or all beneficial EU VAT facilities, as well as EU VAT burdens. As a result, both EU and UK businesses should thoroughly analyse supply chains, financial processes and the underlying contracts to remain VAT compliant in the new regime.

Simplified Triangulation Scenario VAT

One of the biggest anticipated changes to VAT relates to the simplified triangulation scenario that potentially no longer applies to transactions where a UK entity is involved. These supplies are also often referred to as drop-shipments. In brief, simplified triangulation applies if three parties in three different EU member states supply goods and the first trader (A) ships the products directly to the third party (C) in the chain. In this scenario, both sales (A to B and B to C) can be treated as if these are zero-rated intracommunity supplies, and the middleman (B) is not required to register for VAT in the country of arrival of the goods.

Brexit affects both UK and EU businesses involved in triangular sales, and the actual impact depends on the role in the chain as the following three scenarios demonstrate.

UK Middleman

This scenario triggers an intracommunity sale from The Netherlands to Ireland. The UK middleman B needs to register for VAT in Ireland (as this is the country where the goods physically arrive) and report a VAT acquisition in Ireland. In this example, the subsequent sale to the Irish customer is subject to local Irish VAT rules.

Intracommunity Sales with Triangulation

As the invoicing rules may differ per EU country, B may need to invoice local VAT or apply a domestic reverse charge (i.e., the customer reports the VAT). If B does not have an EU VAT registration, the Dutch manufacturer will have to charge Dutch VAT. This does not relieve the UK middleman from the obligation to register for VAT in Ireland and report an intracommunity acquisition.

UK Manufacturer

UK Manufacturer VAT Triangulation

In this scenario, the goods are exported from the UK by the UK manufacturer and imported into Germany by the final customer. The sale by the Dutch trader is out of scope for VAT and the German customer remits import VAT in Germany. However, here Incoterms and Customs regulations impact which party in the chain will and can act as the exporter from the UK or the importer in Germany, and the Incoterms may also impact the VAT liability.

UK Final Customer

This scenario for VAT purposes is highly comparable to the previous situation where the goods originated from the UK. However, here an export from The Netherlands and an import into the UK occur.

Trinagulation VAT to final customer

In both of the above export/import scenarios, the middleman might prefer to be the importer or exporter of record to avoid transparency on who the manufacturer or final customer is (giving them an option to cut out the middleman) or to prevent the ultimate customer from gaining insights into the commercial values of the first transaction (A to B) through customs documentation.

So, what should you do?

  • The middleman should analyse the supply chain to assess if simplified triangulation is currently applied, and if Incoterms should be included in this review.
  • Next, determine which party in the chain will be the exporter or importer and who should assume VAT liability in the country of import.
  • Where needed and possible, contracts and Incoterms should be adjusted, or VAT and EORI registrations must be put in place.
  • The middleman should review the import-export process and documentation to avoid unwanted side effects due to increased transparency.

Explore more resources from our industry influencers:

Peter Boerhof, VAT Director at Vertex Inc. Vertex's Chief Tax Office (CTO) provides insight regarding the impact of tax regulations, policy, enforcement, and emerging technology trends on global tax department operations.

Peter Boerhof

Senior Director, VAT

See All Resources by Peter

Peter Boerhof is the Senior VAT Director for Vertex. In his role, he provides insight and thought leadership regarding the impact of tax regulations, policy, enforcement, and emerging technology trends in global tax. Peter has extensive experience in international transactions, business restructuring, tax process optimisation, and tax automation. Prior to joining Vertex, Peter was responsible for leading the indirect tax function at AkzoNobel, where he designed and implemented a tax control framework, optimised VAT, and managed the transition to a centralised tax operating model for global tax processes.

He was also responsible for indirect tax planning and compliance for merger and acquisition, supply chain, and ERP projects, as well as the implementation of tax automation initiatives like tax engines and robotics. Boerhof also worked at KPN Royal Dutch Telecom managing VAT, as well as Big Four accounting firms Deloitte and Ernst & Young (EY) advising on VAT compliance and optimisation processes. Boerhof holds an MBA from the Rotterdam School of Management and a master’s in tax law from the University of Groningen.

View Newsletter Signup