Conquer Future
    Tax Challenges
    with Vertex

    Vertex is
    shaping the future
    of corporate tax

    Vertex Enterprise, a true enterprise technology solution, will set the standard for tax operations excellence.

    Learn More

    Still Have Questions?

    Contact us at 800.355.3500
    or submit a
    Web inquiry

    Vertex Enterprise e-Newsletter

    Get the latest news from Vertex on Tax Accounting, Tax Data Warehouse and our other tax innovations.

    Sales Tax Articles

    Sales Tax State Activity Update - April 2005

    Haul Away Service Taxable in Michigan

    The Michigan Court of Appeals upheld a trial court's decision that delivery and haul away fees were properly taxed, since they were a relevant part of a transaction in which tangible personal property was sold for consumption.

    Background

    The plaintiff purchased a new stove, which was the primary purpose of the transaction.

    The delivery of the new stove and hauling away of the old stove were incidental to the primary purpose. The defendant charged the plaintiff a nominal fee for the delivery and haul away services compared to the cost of the stove.

    Plaintiff's Position

    The plaintiff argued that the delivery and haul away services were not taxable. The opinion failed to enumerate the plaintiff's reasons. The plaintiff also asserted that he was misled because the defendant advised him that the services were taxable when he contends they are not taxable. The plaintiff argued that the result is a violation of the Michigan Consumers Protection Act.

    Defendant's Position

    The defendant offers delivery and haul away services solely to customers that purchase its products. The services did not change the value of the stove. The defendant argued the tax was properly charged pursuant to MCL 205.52(1), which defines the gross proceeds, the basis to which the tax rate is applied. The relevant part of the definition includes the cost of the service purchased.

    Court's Opinion

    The Court of Appeals referred to the Michigan Supreme Court decision in Catalina Marketing, which examined services incidental to the transfer of tangible personal property. If the true object of the transaction is the service, then no tax would apply. If the true object is the transfer of tangible personal property and the service is incidental, then the tax would apply to the total gross proceeds. In this case, the court affirmed the decision of the trial court that the delivery and haul away services are taxable.

    View the ruling here.

    (Timothy W. Herman v. Best Buy Stores L.P., No. 251499, State of Michigan Court of Appeals, March 15, 2005)


    Subscribe to CyberTax News and receive the latest indirect tax news, including rate changes, rule updates, compliance issues, and more, delivered directly to your email.

    Email Address